国外研究现状

The purpose of this project is to explore the response of the Korean authorities to the fallout from the financial crisis that began in the fall of 1997. The project is situated in the domestic and international political economy and examines how the Korean government adjusted to practices in global finance and commerce. What is being examined at a practical level is to what extent has there been policy learning about financial policy governance within the Korean state since the 1997 financial collapse. The article concludes that there has not been enough political, social and institutional development in financial governance to accompany the purely economic advances.

这个项目的目的是探讨应对朝鲜当局在1997年秋天开始的金融危机的余波。该项目坐落在国内和国际政治经济和调整，韩国政府将研究如何在全球金融和贸易的做法。在实践层面探讨是何种程度上有政策学习在朝鲜国家有关金融政策，治理自1997年金融崩溃。在文章的最后有足够的政治，社会和体制发展中的财务治理陪纯粹的经济发展。

Recent developments concerning the international financial architecture have drawn attention to what many perceive to be an accountability deficit at the level of global decision making. This problem is explored here within the framework of an increasingly globalised structure of financial governance, drawing attention to the institutional barriers that stand in the way of operationalising traditional forms of accountability. In order to strengthen a global form of accountability in the absence of traditional democratic links between citizens and decision-making institutions, it is argued that accountability needs to be better internalised within those institutions that actually make decisions with global consequences. To be effective, however, this form of accountability demands the formation of a global financial public sphere, where norms of inclusion and publicness can be established and progressively instantiated. The first step towards realising such a development must be to understand accountability itself in terms of what can be called a logic of participation. This article therefore considers how such a logic can be formulated and grafted onto the existing foundations of global financial governance, and advances several strategies to strengthen accountability framed in this way. 【篇名】 【刊名】 【出版社名称】 【作者名称】 【期刊ISSN】

Globalising Accountability within the International Organisation of Credit: Financial Governance and the Public Sphere Global Society Routledge

Randall D. Germain 1360-0826

【期刊电子版ISSN】 1469-798X 【文章DOI】

10.1080/1360082042000221450

有关国际金融架构的最近的事态发展已引起关注，许多人认为是一个在全球决策的水平问责赤字。这个问题是一个日益全球化的金融治理结构的框架内，探讨在这里提请注意尽快运行的传统形式，问责的方式站立的体制性障碍。为了加强在全球公民和决策机构之间缺乏民主传统的链接形式的问责，这是认为，问责制需要更好的内在是在这些机构实际上与全球性的后果作出决定。是有效的，但是，这种形式的问责制的要求，形成一个全球性的金融公共领域，其中的包容性和公共性的规范，可以建立并逐步实例。努力实现这样的发展的第一步必须了解什么可以称得上是参与逻辑方面的问责制本身。因此，本文认为如何这样的逻辑，可以制定和嫁接到现有全球金融治理的基础，并提出若干策略，以加强问责制框架，在这种方

式。