A rolling stone gathers no moss
Recently，the frequent job-hopping of young people has aroused wide concern among the public. The phenomenon also has caused a host of individuals to reflect on its advantages and disadvantages.When it comes to this issue, there is no doubt that opinions vary from person to person.
Those who hold the opinion that job-hopping is beneficial to young people claim that by doing so, the youngsters are more likely to have a better knowledge of other fields and then to expand their horizons. Moreover，changing jobs frequently offers workers a chance to move up to a better position. However, others take a totally different view that job-hopping is detrimental to one's career development. For one thing, as the common saying goes,\"a rolling stone gathers no moss.\" The more frequent you change your job, the less likely you are to be an expert in a particular area. For another, this behavior will leave on the employers an impression of instability and immaturity. It is no wonder that ,when interviewing a candidate, a employer will raise a question like\"you've changed jobs quite frequently. How do we know you'll stay if we hire you? \"What’s worse,If you are perpetually moving, it's difficult to make long-term plans. A little stability in career and workplace can help them cope more effectively with the stresses that are sure to occur within the rest of their lives.
From my perspective,on the one hand ,frequent job-hopping would not necessarily be a bad thing. It may offer them a broader space for career development. When people join a company，the new working environment，new
colleagues and new enterprise cultural atmosphere will definitely motivate their enthusiasm for the new job and thus, prompt their career to a new level.on the other hand , employees who remain at a single company are able to rise in seniority, rather than having to compete for a stronger role at each new company as they go.In addition,most people who stay at a company for a decade or more progress
through
multiple increasingly challenging roles while they're there. They typically try their hands at a variety of roles to help determine what they're most passionate about. The difference between moving within a company and moving between companies is that employees are able to retain their status and benefits while also being free to experiment and try some new things.All in all,my view on job-hopping is that it is reasonable to change your job if you have a better opportunity.
A rolling stone gathers no moss
Recently, the frequent job-hopping of young people has aroused wide concern among the public. The phenomenon also has caused a host of individuals to reflect on its advantages and disadvantages. When it comes to this issue, there is no doubt that opinions vary from person to person.
Those who hold the opinion that job-hopping is beneficial to young people claim that by doing so, the youngsters are likely to have a better knowledge of other fields and then to expand their horizons. Moreover, changing jobs frequently offer workers a chance to move up to a better position. However, others take a totally different view that job-hopping is detrimental to one's career development. For one thing, as the common saying goes, \"a rolling stone gathers no moss. \" The more frequent you change your job, the less likely you are to be an expert in a particular area. For another, this behavior will leave on the employers an impression of instability and immaturity. It is no wonder that, when interviewing a candidate, an employer will raise a question like\"you've changed jobs quite
frequently. How do we know you'll stay if we hire you? \"What's worse, if you are perpetually moving, it's difficult to make long-term plans. A little stability in career and workplace can help them cope more effectively with the stresses that are sure to occur within the rest of their lives.
From my perspective, on the one hand, frequent job-hopping would not necessarily be a bad thing. It may offer them a broader space for career development. When people join a company, the new working environment, new colleagues and new enterprise cultural atmosphere will definitely make them harder work. On the other hand, employees who remain at a single company are able to rise in seniority, rather than having to compete for a stronger role at each new company as they go. In addition, most people who stay at a company for a decade or more progress through multiple increasingly challenging roles while they're there. They typically try their hands at a variety of roles to help determine what they're most passionate about. The difference between the former and the later is that employees are able to retain their status and benefits while also being free to experiment and try some new things. All in all, my view
on job-hopping is that it is reasonable to change your job if you have a better opportunity.
.
.
因篇幅问题不能全部显示，请点此查看更多更全内容